Canadian Police Hazmat Teams Raid Drug Lab

Posted by Austin Cushing on May 11, 2012
Chemical Protection, Law Enforcement / No Comments

A quick reminder from Greater Victoria, Canada that police need hazardous materials suits too:

Police drug lab experts in full hazardous materials suits and gas masks found unmarked chemicals in five-gallon drums in a backyard shed as part of a search performed in response to a tipoff by a neighbor. Although it is too early to tell what the chemicals were to be used for, they were highly flammable and could have started an explosion if not handled with the full caution dangerous chemicals deserve.

This is an excellent example of hazards that can be experienced by law enforcement officers that might require chemical protection and chemical handling skills in order to properly investigate and prosecute crimes in progress. The information gathered at this scene will be used to determine what was being prepared for manufacture and distribution, as well as where it was being sourced, and proper care was needed to protect officers and properly preserve the evidence so that it could be tested appropriately and safely without contamination.

(full story available at the Victoria Times Colonist)

Tags: , , ,

Choosing a Flame-Resistant Fabric

Posted by Austin Cushing on April 16, 2012
Industrial, Safety / No Comments

Flame-resistant clothing is a necessity for employees working in environments where flash fires or explosions are a concern. There is a wide variety of fire retardant fabrics available to meet the needs of an HRC 1 or HRC 2 situation. Knowing the difference between these fabrics and their uses can help save your life.

DuPont Nomex

DuPont Nomex is an inherently flame-resistant anti-static fabric that has been engineered to reduce nuisance levels of static. It will not ignite, melt, drip, or burn, and is self-extinguishing. These qualities make it ideal as an all-around fabric for applications in the petrochemical, gas, electric, and fire service industries, as well as for other professional uses. A single layer of 4.5 ounce Nomex has an NFPA 70E arc rating of 4.6, and qualifies as HRC 1 protection.

TenCate Advance

TenCate Advance combines the dependability of Nomex in situations that require flame resistance with the rugged strength and durability of Kevlar to form a uniquely hardworking fabric that provides uncompromising performance when you need it for strength and durability far surpassing either alone. A single layer of 7.0 ounce Advance has an NFPA 70E arc rating of 8.5, and qualifies as HRC 2 protection.

TenCate TecaSafe Plus

TenCate TecaSafe Plus is an inherently flame-resistant fabric that delivers NFPA 70E category 2 electrical arc protection while remaining comfortable and lightweight. It also meets the performance requirements of the NFPA 2112 – Standard on Flame-Resistant Garments for Protection of Industrial Personnel Against Flash Fire. This fabric gives exceptional value due to its excellent after wash appearance, good color fastness, durability, and long life cycle. A single layer of 7.0 ounce TecaSafe Plus has an NFPA 70E arc rating of 8.4, and qualifies as HRC 2 protection.

Reliant

Reliant EMC (engineered modacrylic cotton) is an inherently flame-resistant knit fabric designed to smother flames when exposed to fiber. The protective qualities of modacrylic fiber are locked in and cannot be washed or worn out regardless of usage. This knit fabric combines the comfort, softness, and breathability of combed cotton with uncompromised fire resistant protection. Reliant has not currently been rated under NFPA 70E standards.

Indura

Indura is a 100% cotton fabric treated with a permanent flame-resistant finish. Indura offers affordable, comfortable protection and is most popular in industrial applications for protection against potential risks associated with welding and similar activities. Indura retains the properties of natural cotton for comfort and absorbancy purposes. A single layer of 7.0 ounce Indura has an NFPA 70E arc rating of 7.7, and qualifies as HRC 1 protection.

Indura Ultra Soft

Indura Ultra Soft is a cotton / nylon blend of fabric treated with a permanent flame-resistant finish. The addition of high tenacity nylon increases the wear life of the garment significantly without compromising the garment’s comfort. Indura Ultra Soft fabric is designed to withstand regular industrial launderings and provides excellent protection from flash fires as well as electrical arc flash exposure. A single layer of 7.0 ounce Indura has an NFPA 70E arc rating of 8.7, and qualifies as HRC 2 protection.

FireWear

FireWear is an inherently flame-resistant fabric blended from cotton and fibrous flame-retardant fiber designed to smother flames when exposed to fire. The FFR Fiber is designed to emit a noncombustible gas through microscopic pores in the fiber when the fiber is exposed to flame. This gas smothers flames much like a fire extinguisher. Firewear fabrics are blended with cotton and thus have many of the same benefits as cotton, including breathability and lightweight comfort. A single layer of 5.5 ounce FireWear has an NFPA 70E arc rating of 7.0, and qualifies as HRC 1 protection.

There are many choices for the user looking to purchase a flame resistant garment. Verify that the material you are purchasing is rated for the task you intend to perform; HRC 3 or 4 requirements usually require additional full layered suits, whereas one or two layers of the fabrics listed here is usually sufficient for HRC 1 or 2 requirements. For a more in-depth explanation of hazard risk categories, see my previous article, Understanding Hazard Risk Categories.

Some of the information in this article was provided with the assistance of Topps Safety Apparel, manufacturers of flame-resistant coveralls, jumpsuits, public safety uniforms, and other apparel. Anchortex Corporation is a full line leading distributor of Topps Safety Apparel.

Tags: , , , ,

Law Enforcement Tools for Dynamic Entry

Posted by Austin Cushing on April 14, 2012
Uncategorized / No Comments

Law enforcement officers executing a search warrant face unique challenges. In most cases, they are not welcome and must gain forcible entry as quickly as possible before vital evidence can be destroyed or disposed of. For this reason, law enforcement officers engaged in dynamic entry activities typically use tools meant specifically to break down, cut through, or pry apart obstacles that might impede them from conducting a thorough search. Thus, tactical entry kits are a common sight among search teams when resistance is expected.

A good, sturdy pair of bolt cutters are a vital asset to a tactical entry team. Padlocks, security chains, barbed wire, and chain link fences are often used to keep people out, but a sturdy pair of bolt cutters will let police search teams in. The best models include heat treated, hardened cutting edges to give them the best chance against sturdy bolts, and are designed specifically to not conduct electricity so that even electrified fences can be dismantled with relative ease.

Breaking down doors and other obstacles, or breaking into secured areas, is another common impediment to searching an area thoroughly. In these situations, the best tactical tool for quick entry is a combination of two separate tools – an axe head for cutting and a sledge head for smashing – into a single tool called a maul. The resulting tool is light enough to be easily carried, but tough enough to break open most obstacles.

Rounding out the tactical tool set, a good prybar or Hallagan tool allows the tactical entry specialist to breach a door or padlock that cannot or should not be broken or cut. These tools can be safely wedged or hammered into position, then pulled or hammered to pry apart or break open locked or jammed doors, sealed containers, and other obstructions with relative ease. They are preferably non-sparking and non-conductive so as to be usable in areas where a fire or electrical hazard exists.

A tactical backpack kit combines these three tools into a single unit that can be worn on the back, where the tools are easily accessible when needed but do not occupy the hands when idle. They allow search operations to be carried out efficiently and quickly, reducing the risk to officers and civilians. Every search team should have at least one tactical backpack kit ready to go when dynamic entry is authorized.

Poly-Cotton versus Cotton: Which Makes A Better Towel?

Posted by Austin Cushing on April 11, 2012
Uncategorized / No Comments

The question seems simple enough – which is a better towel to suit a large facility’s needs? Are there significant advantages to one over the other? Both towels have specific advantages that make them better suited towards a specific market, but both towels have their place within an institutional environment.

Cotton towels and cotton washcloths are naturally more absorbent than poly-cotton blends, capable of absorbing over twenty times their weight in liquids. Furthermore, cotton becomes stronger when wet, making it ideal for vigorous scrubbing and cleaning tasks. It can also withstand higher temperatures than blended fabrics, meaning that it can be sanitized in boiling water easily and making it ideal for institutional settings where cleanliness is highly important. Finally, it feels softer to the touch and is naturally hypoallergenic, resulting in a more comfortable experience when used. This makes them ideal for use in hotels, hospitals, and other institutional environments.

Blended poly-cotton towels and poly-cotton washcloths are less absorbent than 100% cotton, but are more easily maintained. The addition of polyester to the blend makes for a fabric that is more durable overall while retaining cotton’s advantages. Furthermore, poly-cotton blends repel dirt and grime more readily, and dry out more quickly after use. This makes them common staples in hotels, motels, locker rooms, prisons, and other institutional environments where mildew may be a concern.

Is your hospitality, institutional, or correctional facility looking to stock up on linens and laundry supplies? Contact one of our friendly sales representatives to find a solution to meet your size, weight, and color requirements without breaking your budget.

How Transportation Security Administration Scanners Work

Posted by Austin Cushing on April 08, 2012
Uncategorized / No Comments

Have you ever wondered to yourself what exactly those airport security people see when they look into your bags with an X-ray machine? Do you ponder what they could possibly be doing with your shoes when they run a check on them for explosives or narcotics? Do you contemplate how accurate their metal detectors can be to detect everything from a loaded firearm down to a spare house key you forgot to take out of your jacket pocket? Do you want to know why they insist on having you remove your laptops and other major electronic devices from your bags before scanning them? Read on and learn more.

Flying in the modern world can be a nuisance. The versatility of determined people who want to smuggle contraband, weapons, or bombs onto a flight is responsible for the many procedures any airport traveler must endure on the way to their flight. A typical business traveler might expect to have to remove his shoes for examination, remove his laptop from his bags for X-ray scanning, have his bags swabbed, and pass through a metal detector for the dubious privilege of purchasing ‘secure’ drinks at the airport gate restaurant for exorbitant prices while waiting for his flight. However, every step of this thorough examination has a purpose, to limit the ways in which a terrorist threat or illegal cargo can board an airplane.

The traveler himself typically has to pass an inspection via metal detector. A standard FAA-approved metal detector such as the AUTOClear CheckGate 8000 is fairly straightforward – the person to be tested passes through the metal detector, and a loud tone is emitted if a metal object is detected on their person. To prevent inadvertent alarms from nearby objects, quality metal detectors usually are built to screen out electromagnetic and radio frequency noise (so the cell phone of the guy behind you who refuses to put it in the X-ray machine until the very last moment won’t get you in trouble) and calibrated to their environment (so as not to generate large amounts of false positives from poor design choices like placing the metal detector on a metal walkway.) They usually are also calibrated so that, for example, the metal in the zipper of your trousers won’t set it off, but the hula girl letter opener you forgot to take out of your jacket pocket will, by determining a given ‘safe’ threshold that must be exceeded for the alarm to sound.

When more careful examination is required, TSA officials and other security personnel rely on hand wands – lightweight metal detectors that provide variable tones based on the amount of metal present. This allows security officers to quickly, efficiently, and noninvasively scan people for weapons without an intrusive physical search, and provides evidence to authorize a physical search if necessary.

Meanwhile, your carry-on luggage is subjected to X-ray scanning from a TSA-approved cargo screening X-ray scanner such as the AUTOClear 6040, which feeds luggage through on a conveyor while allowing security personnel to see the contents and determine the materials thereof. Modern scanners like the 6040 allow security personnel to see organic, inorganic, and composite materials in different colors (orange, blue, and green, for the AUTOClear line), with darker colors indicating greater density. This allows the machine operator to easily pinpoint potential bomb and weapon components, as well as narcotics and other smuggled goods, without requiring an invasive (and possibly dangerous) search of every bag by hand. This is why airport security requires that you remove laptops and other bulky electronics to be scanned separately, among other restrictions – to avoid false positives made when a set of innocuous contents resembles an explosive on the X-ray monitors. Since the TSA must take every potential threat seriously — after all, they will have to handle the explosive consequences firsthand — cutting down on these misidentifications ensures a safer environment for them and the public, and ensures less delays in travel.

While you may not directly see this in action (unless you regularly travel with large amounts of electronics), trace detectors such as the AUTOClear E5000 are also used on your checked luggage (and occasionally on yourself and your carry-on luggage) to detect possible traces of explosives and narcotic substances, either by analyzing them for a match to specific known compounds or by attempting to match them to the components commonly found in explosive substances. This commonly requires a simple surface test of the object to be scanned, and takes less than a minute to perform. As someone who has personally seen these tests in action from previous airport trips, I can assure you that they are non-invasive (usually a simple cotton swab over the surface area, or a close ‘sniff’ by the nozzle of the device, is all that is necessary), and simply allow for a presumptive scan of an object or area in the same way that a drug-sniffing or bomb-sniffing dog’s perusal can give probable cause to more carefully inspect a suspicious item or person. Detecting the residue of military explosives on one’s shoes might simply mean they are a soldier on their way home from active duty, but it also might mean that someone’s been building bombs in their basement — probably not the person you want sitting next to you on a long flight.

The Transportation Security Administration uses X-ray scanners, trace detectors, and metal detectors to screen passengers and luggage to provide safety and security to passengers and flight crew with as little impact on speed as possible. New advancements in scanning technology mean faster processing at the airport terminal and safer flights for all concerned. The TSA has a difficult, dangerous, and often thankless job to do, and security scanners such as those manufactured by AUTOClear ensure they can do their job to the best of their capabilities.

Military Are Measuring Up For New Uniforms

Posted by Austin Cushing on April 06, 2012
Military, Standards, Uniforms / No Comments

In the first survey taken since 1988, measuring sticks and high-tech body scans are being used to take measurements of over twelve thousand service personnel to develop size standards for uniforms and other equipment, as well as to determine how much to stock in each size. Men and women are to be measured separately in running shorts and tank tops brought by the measurement contractor to ensure consistency.

The new survey comes in the wake of realizations that more large-sized uniforms than expected were required for deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan, and that new women’s sizes in combat uniforms, body armor, and other items are necessary for optimum performance.

The study will be used to generate new standards for uniform and equipment sizes, as well as to create avatars for computerized simulations, to figure out space requirements for vehicle cockpits and seats, and to ensure that ‘small’, ‘medium’, and ‘large’ are more consistently applicable across separate pieces of equipment.

Anchortex Corporation looks forward to supplying the men and women of tomorrow’s armed forces with the uniforms and body armor they need in the new size standards they require.

Tags: , ,

What Makes Institutional Quality?

Posted by Austin Cushing on March 24, 2012
Uncategorized / No Comments

You may have noticed that institutional furnishings are made to a higher standard than your typical office furniture. Police stations, jails, prisons, military bases, detention facilities, medical institutions, parks, schools, and many other public and private facilities all demand furniture that is inexpensive, durable, and can survive whatever man or nature can throw at it. So what goes into making an item institutional-quality?

When people think ‘institutional’, they typically think of an environment where conditions towards furnishings are especially abusive, and durability is a top concern. The typical injection-molded plastic chair for use in an institutional environment is impact and flame-resistant, capable of surviving being hurled across a room without the slightest sign of damage. Your typical mattress for prison or dormitory use is designed to resist cutting and burning, while still being easy to clean. Comfort is typically a secondary concern.

This isn’t always the case, though. Take this lovely item, for instance – a stylish wooden chair with a soft foam cushion that wouldn’t look out of place in a waiting room, yet conceals a skeleton of steel that allows it to withstand damage that would shatter a lesser chair. For your office commander who wants something a bit more durable, there’s even office chairs designed with lasting quality and durability in mind. ‘Institutional’ quality doesn’t necessarily mean uncomfortable, just durable.

Institutional furniture also doesn’t necessarily mean ‘prison furniture.’ This dining table is actually common in high school and hospital cafeterias, due to its combination of durability and affordability. Folding tables like these are used as demo tables in high-traffic stores such as Wal-Mart due to their sturdiness under pressure. These outdoor rectangular tables are frequently found in state and national parks due to their ability to endure the worst weather. Institutional quality simply means a product that is designed to last.

Anchortex Corporation is a leading distributor in institutional-quality furnishings and fixtures through its correctional division, American Detention Supplies, as well as directly to businesses and organizations across the United States. If you’re looking for furniture that can survive the test of time and the tribulations of mankind, look no further and contact us for more information.

Bug Out with the Deployer Sea Bag from Force Protector Gear!

Posted by Austin Cushing on March 22, 2012
Uncategorized / No Comments

Are you looking for a loadout bag that will actually survive its intended purpose? While we all hope to never need to pack up and run on a moment’s notice, many people are preparing ‘survival bags’ just in case the worst actually takes place. With this in mind, I’d like to introduce you to the sort of bag used by the United States Marine Corps — the FOR65 Deployer USMC Replacement Sea Bag, manufactured by Force Protector Gear in the United States.

At $445.19, the FOR65 Deployer might sound like an expensive choice for the would-be survivalist – but unlike many other ‘bug-out bags’ or ‘loadout bags’, the FOR65 has been put to the test in combat zones as a solution for rapid deployment. Designed to exceed military durability specifications in every way, the FOR65 Deployer is built to be extremely weatherproof and waterproof, and can be converted quickly from a heavy-duty rucksack to a rolling luggage system to a stowable footlocker with a minimum of effort. Designed to withstand physical and environmental abuse in military combat situations, this collapsible loadout bag is a popular choice amongst hardcore survivalists who want to ensure their gear can survive whatever the world throws at them.

Looking for supplies to stock your existing bugout bag? Anchortex Corporation can help, providing comprehensive quotes on itemized survival kit requirements, including MREs, water purification supplies, cooking supplies, first aid kits and components, firestarting tools, survival manuals, camping equipment, weather-appropriate clothing, tactical apparel, bedding items, survival radios, fixed blade and folding knives, multi-tools, duct tape, paracord, tarps, navigation equipment, and other camp supplies. Whether you’re looking to prepare for the worst for yourself, for your family, or for a larger group, you owe it to yourself to get ready now. Contact our sales department and get your loadout gear from one place at a great price!

What’s So Humane About Humane Restraints?

Posted by Austin Cushing on March 18, 2012
Uncategorized / No Comments

How humane can a restraint really be? To answer that, you have to understand more about how restraint systems such as straitjackets, restraint chairs, and bed restraints are used.

First and foremost, physical restraints are used to ensure the safety of the people responsible for handling a potentially aggressive or agitated person, and the safety of the person themselves to prevent undue suffering or self-harm. As such, institutions, hospitals, and correctional facilities look for ways to restrain without inflicting harm or undue stress, while maintaining the level of safety and security needed. Restraints used for this purpose are made of heavy-duty leather, easy-care polyurethane, or compact nylon, providing a firm restraint that resists wear and tear while being far more comfortable to wear than metal.

One example of the use of humane restraint systems can be seen in hospitals and psychiatric institutions. In addition to lightweight gait belts, lap belts, and safety belts meant purely to prevent falls, buckling and locking restraints are available to accommodate aggressive patients. These can readily be combined with a restraint bed to provide an ideal platform for securing an individual in comfort and safety. Medical applications may require a secured position to prevent further injury after an accident or during care. For this purpose, non-locking restraints with control straps are used to secure an individual in place safely, often with interior foam padding or disposable fleece liners to provide additional comfort while maintaining a therapeutic state for recovery and safe transport. In this way, emergency medical personnel or hospitals can safely transport an individual without creating movement that may agitate or reopen existing injuries.

Police officers, jails, correctional facilities, and courthouses make use of humane restraint systems as well. While handcuffs are a common restraint mechanism, other restraint options are available. Locking restraints made of leather or polyurethane allow a prisoner to be secured in position in such a way as to minimize self-injury. For example, nylon control straps are used to secure the legs of a violent prisoner for transport, reducing squad car damage and personal injuries by restricting leg movement. Ambulatory restraint systems allow a prisoner’s hands and feet to be secured in a safe position to control movement without requiring behind-the-back cuffing that can result in long-term physical harm. Locking restraints made of leather or polyurethane allow a prisoner to be secured in position in such a way as to minimize self-injury. Transport belts are used with handcuffs to provide greater control over a detained subject, or with the included side cuffs to restrain an individual while keeping their hands separated for greater safety. Emergency restraint chairs provide a locking solution to secure aggressive or dangerous prisoners for transport in such a way as to prevent harm to themselves or others. Leg braces and locking weights allow for a discreet way to restrict the movement of would-be flight hazards during transport outside of a correctional facility, such as during a trial or prisoner transfer.

All of these solutions are designed to enhance the comfort of the restrained individual while still protecting the safety of those around them. For situations where confinement or restriction of movement is required either for medical or security reasons, our Humane Restraint products do exactly what they say – they restrain or restrict an individual from harming others or themselves without inflicting undue suffering or discomfort, and that is why I feel they are truly humane restraints.

Military Heroes and the Boots They Wear

Posted by Austin Cushing on March 11, 2012
Uncategorized / 1 Comment

Whether marching under a hot desert sun, standing at attention in the middle of a blizzard, or charging into enemy fire, soldiers need boots they can rely on. Based on our industry knowledge and feedback from our customers, we have compiled a list of five military boot brands that have shown enduring support for the soldier over the years.

Bates Uniform Footwear
Since 1887, Bates Uniform Footwear has been focused on the best in dress and tactical footwear for military personnel in nearly forty countries worldwide. Bates has manufactured military uniform footwear styles for all branches of the armed services, and serves as one of the largest suppliers of footwear to the US federal government, the Department of Defense, and public service departments throughout the United States. They also manufacture duty footwear for uniformed public service personnel, and are a popular choice among police and security personnel.

Belleville Shoe
Belleville Shoe was founded in 1904, and is currently the country’s largest supplier of military boots, producing over one million pairs annually, and is one of the most well-known and most commonly requested boots. Each pair is specifically designed to meet or exceed military specifications for durability and comfort without needing lengthy breaking in or acclimation. If you want the boot that is always on the front lines, you want a Belleville.

Altama Delta Corporation
Altama was founded in 1969, and got its military start manufacturing olive drab jungle boots for US soldiers serving in Vietnam. It has since become a leading manufacture of mil-spec boots for the Department of Defense, and also markets to federal, state, and local agencies, police, Special Forces teams, and military and ROTC schools. Altama is constantly developing new series to meet the changing needs of the American soldier, whether it be active duty performance or personal comfort.

Danner Uniform Footwear
Danner’s ambition is to satisfy the needs of expert users in the military and law enforcement fields, focusing on maximum performance and quality. Danner sets the highest standards for their products, regardless of the end user. If you simply must have the best quality boots, you can’t go wrong with Danner.

Wellco Enterprises
Wellco and its subsidiary, Ro-Search, have been developing new innovations in footwear manufacturing technology since 1941, setting standards for Army combat footwear that are still in use today. The present generation of combat boots – with high-traction rubber tread sole, polyurethane midsole, and direct-molded rubber base sole – can be directly traced to a development contract awarded to Ro-Search in 1995 by US Army Natick Laboratories.

Military boots are designed to protect a soldier’s feet in the worst conditions imaginable. Our military heroes deserve footwear that does everything they ask, so that they can do everything we ask of them. When preparing your next care package for a soldier serving active duty, consider sending a new pair of duty boots – they’ll thank you for it.